Some people think that robots are very important for human’s future development. Others, however, think that robots are a dangerous invention that could have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the modernization era, it is controversial that whether robots are crucial for the upcoming development of human-beings or they are hazardous inventions posing a threat to society. From my perspective, though the disadvantages of robots are quite various, they are still considered as helpful servants for residents in their aspects of lives.
Those who support the idea that robots are a danger to society firstly deem that this invention can appropriate residents’ career opportunities. Since this artificial intellectual device has the ability to eventually handle a majority of company tasks, leads to the demands of corporation employees are considerably decreased. As an illustration, a higher rate of unemployment is witnessed recently due to the appearances of automatic convenient stores in Korea, consisting of only vending machines and robots for basic services but customers are still able to serve themselves without any staffs.
Nevertheless, the opposite proponents believe that the robot could be tremendously efficient in the laboring environment. Industrial robots produce more precise and well-qualified work with a small possibility of making mistakes at a speedier level than human workers. A typical example for this is the car manufacturing chain, especially in prosperous nations. Their governments apply robotic technologies in creating the most contemporary engines for luxurious car brands such as Mercedes, Lamborghini and so on to assemble enormous profits for the employments themselves and the countries’ economy. Furthermore, robots are able to reduce the company expenses in the long run with agile financial returns and less material inquiry.
To sum up, both the arguments have their own merits as discussed above. However, it is undeniable that the advent of the robot is one of the most advanced technologies that has brought about significant innovations to social life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 599, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to serve themselves without any staffs. Nevertheless, the opposite proponents be...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6678200692 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26887994314 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657439446367 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9327642121 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217378515242 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720017864 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039803548762 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120420235907 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202468991392 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.