When it comes to robots, opinions differ among people. While some people suggest that these technological machines offer several advantages, others consider them to be one of the factors that negatively impact human’s life. In this essay, I will examine both standpoints in further detail and give my own stance on this issue.
On the one hand, robots pose some threats to our community. Firstly, robots can be misused for immoral purposes by wicked individuals. For instance, hackers will install some spywares into automated teller machines (ATMs) to illegally steal customers’ private information. Subsequently, when the installation is successful, these robots would automatically read all card details, and amounts of money will be stolen from the victims' accounts after they conduct transactions. Additionally, robots are the main cause for several health problems for humans. To illustrate, if people are over-reliant on labor-saving robots, they will become less active. Therefore, a sedentary lifestyle will be created among users, contributing to both physical diseases and mental disorders due to poor health conditions.
On the other hand, I believe that robots are a vital invention as their appearance can enhance safety for people. In daily life, regarding transportation, many individuals’ cars equipped with an accident alert system can help drivers avoid unexpected incidents by sending them notifications of possible dangers. As a result, unwanted injuries could be considerably reduced. Additionally, in the heavy industry, especially in assembly lines, technologically sophisticated gadgets are widely adopted to reduce the risk of work accidents. These machines are responsible for handling dangerous procedures or hazardous materials, thereby raising the safety standard in the workplace for the labour force.
In conclusion, robots can be possibly considered to be life-threatening in some aspects. However, I hold a belief that this technological invention is more beneficial for our future development as they can help reduce the risk of accidents and injuries for humans.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76038338658 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18068408007 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645367412141 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7721203474 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.058823529 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207503785275 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643087663445 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430849289895 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124041387575 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149685874698 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76038338658 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18068408007 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645367412141 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7721203474 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.058823529 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207503785275 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643087663445 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430849289895 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124041387575 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149685874698 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.