The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery

The given diagrams illustrate the current outlay of an exhibition of art and its proposed changes in the future.

Overall, the gallery will witness a notable redevelopment, with a new entrance and an increase in exhibition space.

On the right-hand side of the existing layout, there is the entrance which leads to a lobby. Nonetheless, in the future, the main display area will be directly accessible from the new entrance located to the Parkinson court side of the building. The current office and lobby will be converted into a storage area and an education area including two tables and ten desks.

Another significant change is that two temporary exhibitions at present will be removed. This removal will make room for the bigger permanent exhibition area which is proposed to be twice as large as the current one. In addition, the art gallery will be widened to the west. It will have more space for exhibition with a special exhibition area, and on top of that, there will be an exhibition store where visitors can purchase some available artifacts.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nonetheless, so, in addition, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98876404494 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73440303902 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6367670677 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147463371155 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736648465463 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631725149833 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111662307303 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623255657094 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.