The line graph depicts how the quantity and the sort of processed food that Australian youngsters consumed changed between 1975 and 2000. The unit is measured in the number of times eaten per year.
Overall, it is evident that while the intake of pizza and hamburgers rose significantly during the given period of time, an opposite pattern was recorded for fish and chips.
As can be seen from the graph, in the first year of the observed time span, the consumption of fish and chips was 100 times eaten, taking a lead among all surveyed categories in terms of eaten times per year. However, a considerable decrease was witnessed in the figures for fish and chips during 15 years from 1985, from 95 times in 1985 to under 40 times in 2000.
In terms of pizza and hamburgers, those two kinds of instant food followed a similar trend as they climbed to 100 times and 85 times respectively before remaining stable until 2000. It is noticeable that hamburgers were consumed over 100 times in the year 2000, making it take the lead of fish and chips in 1985.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ers rose significantly during the given period of time, an opposite pattern was recorded for f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68617021277 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41390339619 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2958513744 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0604374208664 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031734723135 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463220820833 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0424492580619 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411389860419 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.