Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the last few decades, a significant increase in environmental pollution undeniably has been raising various concerns of society along with the enhancement of people’s awareness. While several individuals believe that politicians are mainly accountable for conserving the environment rather than residents, there are some reasons for me to contradict this idea.
On the one hand, it is justifiable for some people to claim that governments and politicians should be responsible for environmental problems rather than others. One of the most striking signs is that individuals can not interfere with significant effects to some earth phenomena like global warming, rise level of seas, extreme weather, greenhouse effects,... that come from the dissolves of manufactures, transportation,... To be more specific, only politicians can enact and enforce strict laws about natural protection that noticeably punish corporations or individuals who do harm to the environment. Besides, environmental conservation also requires the collaboration of countries in the world.
However, there are numerous worth analyzing reasons to encourage both governments and residents to protect nature together. The most valid catalyst is the improvement of people’s awareness of the environment. For example, people can launch a wide range of campaigns in the public to propagate about the importance of conserving nature as well as using conservation power devices, eco-friendly and recycling products or simply by using public transportation instead of personal one... which are the key to protecting our planet and keeping it fresh. Moreover, the affordance of governments and politicians can not be effective without communities’ support. One change from an individual may have minimal effects, but millions of people doing better can have considerable effects.
In conclusion, with some valid reasons which are mentioned above, environmental protection should indeed be an obligation for both politicians and residents. Shortly, I believe eco-friendly materials, renewable energy which are researched by scientists as well as new extreme laws will play an essential role in conserving nature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...eas, extreme weather, greenhouse effects,... that come from the dissolves of manuf...
^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...issolves of manufactures, transportation,... To be more specific, only politicians...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88087774295 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33666038761 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598746081505 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4097464351 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.066666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211530057532 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674461833244 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619575002225 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126067023196 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665786246018 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.