Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Language is the medium of communication and it has a strong connection with the cultural and historical aspects with society. This essay agrees with the opinion that the degradation of language can be beneficial and having a seldom number of language will help in hustle free life.
Firstly, Language is the supreme tool of communication and if the language is understandable the whole communication will become pointless. In this changed global scenario, Having few languages
Can prove beneficial especially in the field of business. To cite one example, Business between different part of the world will come under one roof if they use one language for transactions. Eventually, this will help in economic progress as well as in the stronger relationship between the territories.
Secondly, In the field of education language play a pivotal role. Many students are being rejected from top universities only because of the language barrier. For example, a brilliant student from a poor country may not have proficiency in a foreign language and ultimately the student may end up in a local university. Many solutions have been put forward by the experts and one of them is eradicating the language barrier of communication.
Thirdly, If the number of languages can be lessened it will lead to a strong connection between people all over the world. Information and invention can be passed easily which will pave way for peace and prosperity. For instance, alerts regarding natural catastrophes can communicate easily between counties. Moreover, information regarding scientific developments and technological advancement can be transferred conveniently.
Hence, Having few languages to communicate can prove beneficial in the long run and it will lessen language related perplexities among the nations. This will ultimately help in the overall development of countries and people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4897260274 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17389271277 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541095890411 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5303481884 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.1875 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274242535728 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982999105785 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677503497759 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15930856661 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677900437896 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.