Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because it will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
The connections of the world become more closely ever before. In this occasion, some people considered that communication becomes more easily if there are only fewer languages, but on the other sides, some concerned about the importance of the variety of language. In my opinions, I disagree with the assessment that the conversations will be more easily if there are fewer language.
Human interaction becomes more international throughout the development of communication methods. In order to build a conversation between different ethnic, people will translate their language into one tone to reach a consensus. As a result, fewer language seems to be more easily to disposal the language barrier.
On the other hand, there is no doubt that native language represented as a country's culture. Noticeable, human interaction was based on communication. Language, one of the most important element to conversations, involved literacy abilities were the most significant evidence for a region's culture. Revealing a country's history were base on the native language, thousand of meanings were measure inside the words. For example, the word "LIGHT" in Chinese, included the fire element of its structure. The design of this word based on a history theory: The king has forbidden citizens to write the word "FIRE" at that period, so the people redesigned a similar structure of the word "FIRE", lend to the innovation of the word "LIGHT". By following this example, language is not only a method for communication, but it is also provided a history of a country revolution.
In conclusion, I considered that the world should take prevention of the disappearing language since a variety of cultures are so important for us to protect.
- The two maps below showed road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010. 73
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce their consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 61
- Scientist predict that cars will be driven by computers in the near future.What are the possible causes for this? Will it be a positive or negative development? 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...story were base on the native language, thousand of meanings were measure inside the wor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould take prevention of the disappearing language since a variety of cultures are...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as for, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45289855072 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39349265147 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536231884058 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2627296273 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200956924078 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707900188729 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568345203669 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128453048018 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320030031681 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.