I'll begin by saying I disagree with the idea. It might or might not be
true that life will be actually easier when few languages exist. Plus,
even if it is the case, it doesn't mean we should not be concerned with
the extinction of languages.
First of all, let us take a look at what life
would be like if there were only a handful of languages left in the
world. It is true that in such a case, it might be easier for someone
who knows one of the remaining languages to travel around and
communicate with others, given that more people will share one
particular languages, but it can also pose challenges to communities
where the language has been recently adopted. As we all know,
language is the medium for most of the history in a particular
geographical region. Once the language that was used to document
life and events in the past is no longer spoken, it becomes
considerably more difficult to preserve and spark interest in the local
history which can prove invalueble understanding current issues. It is
therefore hard to come to a conclusion that removal of languages will
only render life easier.
Moreover, the issue of languages dying out
goes deeper than losing the ability to understand the past, it touches
some core beliefs in modern societies such as diversity and
autonomies. Evidently, language is largely responsible for the
cultivation of a uniform yet distinct identity shared by the members of
a community. It is the foundation of most nation states and within
nation states political divisions. The extintion of languages will likely
result in a struggle of locating onself in this world for those who have
recently adopted a language that was foreign to the land. Besides, the
diversity in customs and ideas of originally heterogenous groups will
inevitably subside, thereby turning a society into a homogenous one.
As a result, it might actually be easier to rule such a society with
unifying agendas and policies, hence less automies locally. However,
after all those years of modern democracy, is this what we want in the
end though? A homogenous, integrated world that share the same
voices and concerns? I have my reservation for it. It borders the idea
of a brave new world depicted in some of the distopian novels.
To conclude, the prospect of the extinction of languages is not a
particularly thrilling one since one does not necessarily live an easy life
when that coms true and it can bear scary dystopian sounding
consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
Ill begin by saying I disagree with the ide...
^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...xist. Plus, even if it is the case, it doesnt mean we should not be concerned with t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned with the extinction of languages. First of all, let us take a look at what...
^^^
Line 20, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nguages will only render life easier. Moreover, the issue of languages dying o...
^^^
Line 37, column 34, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... idea of a brave new world depicted in some of the distopian novels. To conclude, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 38, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icted in some of the distopian novels. To conclude, the prospect of the extinct...
^^^
Line 39, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clude, the prospect of the extinction of languages is not a particularly thrilli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, after all, as for, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00943396226 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75188857122 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549528301887 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7964200429 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.789473684 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3157894737 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05263157895 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 38.0 4.38176352705 867% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304650274511 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083405901889 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556861194297 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618077617778 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525479917776 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.