Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

These days, world turning into a big country which include too many nationality together. Thanks to technology, sharing, treatment and exploring is not difficult. For this reason people might speak common language instead of protecting and living local languages. I definitely agree this statement. If number of languages will decrease, humans can communicate much easier each other.

Firstly, I want to mention about how languages vanish and how affect world communication. Losing a language is very neutral case over the world, each year local people move to metropolises, in 21st century. Because of migration, people have use common languages, together with new generation do not have any idea about ancestors's languages. Speaking with agreed languages is makes people lives easier, and people understand each other, correctly.

Secondly, If member of nation decrease, probably their languages die with them. Number of people who speak any languages inversely affect languages lifetime. Every corner of the our planet, there are local people who specific languages belong them. So communication with local people will be too tough.

On the other hands, learning local languages which too little community use it, is not necessary as much as common languages. In addition to this, learning local languages has too many difficulties. For instance, local languages have very special rules, so we can not learn these kind of languages easily.

In essence, we can reach that conclusion is, If a language is vanished, it must be, because nobody need it anymore. Abandoning any languages are requirement, this means that kind of languages is not helpful for modern life. We have to learn and speak common languages, so dying out of any languages are help people to communicate each other.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'our'?
Suggestion: the; our
...ect languages lifetime. Every corner of the our planet, there are local people who spec...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...very special rules, so we can not learn these kind of languages easily. In essence, we ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, in addition, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37588652482 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75299746102 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3949497521 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7894736842 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8421052632 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332808496085 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11621914341 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512737129805 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20264057906 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403553268179 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.