Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do
With the advent of technology, innovative procedures to ease out human activities are emerging at a dramatic pace, leading to severe destruction to our environment in the form of Global warming. Excessive emission of detrimental greenhouse gases such as Methane, Carbon dioxide, and Nitric oxide into the atmosphere through agricultural, and industrial revolution have immensely impacted the level of Global temperature. In addition, Water and soil pollution are also posing a serious threat to marine life and humanity as well. This essay would endeavor to shed some light on numerous factors accountable for this alarming situation, followed by some crucial government and individual steps to gobble up this rising issue.
To begin with, it is an undeniable fact that our over-reliance on non-renewable resources in the form of fossil fuels is creating a deadly challenge for our futuristic generations by depleting ice-sheets and the ozone layer. Moreover, human activities, including deforestation to accommodate the increasing population and emission of greenhouse gas, Nitric oxide, which is 300 times more harmful than carbon dioxide, through agricultural techniques and degradation problem of plastics are dragging our entire globe to die out soon. For instance, a recent study has revealed that nearly 25% of sea turtles suffocate to death due to floating plastics.
Hence, both individuals and the government should invest as a combined unit to curb the inevitable after-effects of this problem. Despite various campaigns, strict regulations, and compliances should be generated by the government. For example, some researches on producing eco-friendly and greener renewable ideas should be subsidized by the government. Moreover, as an individual, we should grapple this issue by reducing our dependency on private vehicles to reduce our carbon footprint, endorsing the car-pool ideas, and managing the waste properly.
To conclude, Nowadays, environmental change has become a global agenda. A collaborative approach is the need of the hour and is highly synonymous with the mitigation of some irreparable damages.
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 91
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of households with cars in a European country between 1972 and 2001 82
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honor kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igation of some irreparable damages.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72611464968 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17444842519 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652866242038 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1889249528 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.307692308 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0887595945451 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273327246334 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300694714811 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470424848839 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208205897944 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.