The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given map compares the pictures of an island that has undergone some changes in the context of tourism.

Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the entire island has witnessed a makeover resulting in improved infrastructure, additional tourist facilities, and enhanced accessibility.

According to the given illustration, the island, which was a barren land earlier with a few coconut trees and a sandy beach to the west coast, has now turned into a tourist hot-spot with numerous renovations. Although the width of the island(250 meters) and the coconut grooves remained the same, a myriad of housing facilities along with footpath connectivities have been introduced to the eastern and western ends of the island.

Furthermore, a reception office surrounded by a vehicle track is constructed in the mid-way of the accommodation units. Also, a new restaurant and an extended pier to board the ships with an inter-connectivity of the vehicle tracks have been developed to the northern and southern ends of the restaurant. Besides this, the sandy beach, which is now approachable via a footpath, has added swimming facilities for the tourists.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...id-way of the accommodation units. Also, a new restaurant and an extended pier to...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, look, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42702702703 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22840750951 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616216216216 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.13607544 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.428571429 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128041872433 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579800930066 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386130635562 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820692542606 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397553041451 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.