Famous sportsmen often earn a lot of more money than people in other professions. Although sports is important in our lives, everyone should be equal and such big incomes of sport professionals are unjustified. Do you agree or disagree?
Earning a huge amount of wage by eminent sports personalities, compared to other professional workers, is inappropriate because it is right of every skilled person to get capital equally despite knowing the fact that sport is insurmountable in people's lives. I am in consummate accordance with this notion as well.
There are a number of reasons to support my view and predominant one is more important to the work of other professions than sports personnel. There is no doubt that other proficient individuals not only serve the citizens of a nation, but also help to boost the economy of the country in the form of their work. Doctors, for example, treat diversified patients in every possible situation and pay their taxes on time which redounds government to facilitate its people. But players do enjoyment and play sports to earn wealth for themselves. In short, being true facilitators, other skilful workers provide more aid in many useful ways.
However, some people opine that money earned by renowned sports persons is justifiable because they suffer from severe injuries while playing, just to bring laurels for their country. So, they deserve receiving a hefty amount of earnings in return for their efforts because if they get a serious injury during performance and are not able to pursue their career in sports, they can at least utilize that money for the rest of their life. But I believe that other adepts like soldiers, should get more wages as they safeguard their nation twenty-four seven and sometimes, in unfortunate conditions, sacrifice their lives for saving their citizens. Therefore, giving more salary to popular players than other industrious humans is unjustified.
In conclusion, although sports personalities encounter numerous difficulties, just for the pride of their country, I reaffirm that division of pay should be equal among persons pertaining to any profession, considering their hard work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to receive'.
Suggestion: to receive
...els for their country. So, they deserve receiving a hefty amount of earnings in return fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, in short, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30420711974 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.838311319 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644012944984 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5707448202 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.583333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219009939619 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085147201066 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062599052612 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139177444626 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242463918703 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.