Food can be produced much more cheaply, with the use of improved fertilizers and better machinery. However, some methods may be dangerous for human health and have a negative effect on local communities. To what extent do you think its disadvantages outweigh its advantages?
Healthy food is the key to a healthy life. With the population explosion, the quality of food dropped drastically. But, with the help of better fertilizers and machinery, we can supply food at an affordable price regardless of its menace on human health and local societies. This essay discusses the merits and demerits of technology on food production and will arrive at a logical conclusion.
To embark on, the advances in biotechnology can utilize to control the factors like water, light, and fertilizer to elevate the plant production and thereby reducing the harmful effect of atmospheric changes on plants. For example, in a recent survey conducted by Harward University proved that the farmers who use the most advanced machines and fertilizers have more production than others using traditional methods for cultivation. Moreover, quantity food with exclusive quality, which is quite a herculean task, can be possible if we use these measures for food cultivation.
On the contrary, traditional methods have been accepted widely for its time proved an effect on health. The traditional farmers who were using century-old agricultural methods are in a state of perplexity due to others who don't support the old methods. For instance, Organic farmers are facing trouble less productivity compared to others who are using the fertilizers and machinery. This eventually will lead to the destruction of the traditional farming culture. Most importantly, the adverse effect of these modern inventions yet to be found. So caution must be taken for reaping the benefits.
In my contention, Even though fertilizer and machinery have some disadvantages its advantages are may. So using the support of them will help to produce food cheaply and will meet the need of a large population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will arrive at a logical conclusion. To embark on, the advances in biotechnol...
^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...a state of perplexity due to others who dont support the old methods. For instance, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32746478873 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9682137889 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573943661972 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7562366173 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.866666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32105274611 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956356272048 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625791823575 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18015909297 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150153670506 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.