Foreigners should pay for visiting local historical and cultural attractions. Do you agree or disagree?
"It is true that in most of the times foreigners have to pay more comparing to locals.While some people tend towards the viewpoint that locals and foreigners should pay equal. I would have to support the idea that it is better if the foreigners have to pay more.
On the one hand, there are clear arguments that as they are foreigners are visiting they already invest a lot on their visit. One of the main reasons can be that it will cost more than expected. This means that foreigners have to spent more money on one visit. Another reason can be that local people do not want to waste their money on such places. For example, if the locals have to pay equal prices like foreigners than what would be the difference. For the survival of such attractions foreigners should pay more.
On the other hand, i agree with the viewpoint that foreigners have to pay more. Firstly i believe that foreigners don’t have to pay taxes like citizens. Secondly, i also feel that this historical places require more money for maintanence. For example, a lot of investment is required for maintaining such attractions as it is for this foreigners visit.
In conclusion, it seem to me that historical and cultutal places resembles a nation's culture so this places must be preserved well. If the foreigners pay on visiting these places than it will be worth to visit such places and good maintenance can be done.
"
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...rs have to pay more comparing to locals.While some people tend towards the viewpoint ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... should pay more. On the other hand, i agree with the viewpoint that foreigner...
^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...at foreigners have to pay more. Firstly i believe that foreigners don’t have to p...
^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ired for maintaining such attractions as it is for this foreigners visit. In ...
^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ntaining such attractions as it is for this foreigners visit. In conclusion, it...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s as it is for this foreigners visit. In conclusion, it seem to me that histor...
^^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...foreigners visit. In conclusion, it seem to me that historical and cultutal plac...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74089068826 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5981684775 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465587044534 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 361.8 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5365029832 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6428571429 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359197521247 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136959375977 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802351699497 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219246464395 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615271288149 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.