Fossil fuels are essential for producing electricity, powering industry and fueling transportation. However, one day we will reach a point when all the world’s fossil fuels have been depleted.
How can we conserve these resources?
What are some alternatives to fossil fuels?
The issue of fossil fuel depletion has been highly debatable over the past decade. Natural resources such as coal, oil, gas are commonly utilized in all spheres of modern world as they provide people with electricity, power, but in the future all these energy sources will run out. This essay will discuss possible ways to save these resources and suggest other innovative methods to produce energy.
Nowadays transportation is the main reason for excessive consumption of scarce resources. To tackle this problem, people are to become more energy conscious in terms of the city traffic. It means that individuals should replace private vehicles with other means of transport such as bicycles, underground, public buses and trams. Moreover, the government is also responsible for the mentioned above problem and it can legislatively contribute to conserve natural resources. For instance, London authorities oblige citizens to pay for driving in certain parts of the city during the day. Thus, both residents and the government are able to improve the situation regarding the fossil fuel depletion.
There are several alternatives to energy-efficient minerals, which are the generation of power from natural forces such as wind, water and sun. Wind, tidal and solar energies are highly valuable as they are freely available, and no harmful gases are emitted during the production of energy. For example, scientists from
the Russian Research University claim that the generation of power from water is a more predictable and economical process. Hence, in the future these resources will definitely become the major power generators in the world.
To conclude, I believe that fossil fuel waste is a significant issue, however, they can be conserved by people in many ways such as switching to less energy-intensive means of transport and using alternative methods of energy extraction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of energy. For example, scientists from the Russian Research University claim th...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnative methods of energy extraction.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43728813559 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87904992469 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589830508475 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5326893629 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249080733301 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787324780602 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589627996932 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128536388794 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630831433037 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.