The government should ban smoking in all public areas even though it would restrict some of people's freedoms. Do you agree or disagree?
Different people’s attitude toward smoking has always been ambiguous in all the societies. Smoking needs to be prohibited in the crowded areas, although such a measure would encroach upon smokers’ rights. I completely agree with this statement and believe that smoking is unacceptable in the public places.
Firstly, tobacco consumption is extremely destructive for the internal organs of a person and has an aggravating effect on health in general. This is because tobacco contains nicotine in a cigarette, which, when burned, releases carbon dioxide, nicotinic acid and some tar, which is deposited in the lungs and leads to the development of cancer. Therefore, smokers with airways filled with toxic substances are very much at risk to their health. For example, according to the World Health Organization, about half of people suffering from lung cancer smoke. In other words, smoking causes serious airway problems.
Secondly, the process of smoking is accompanied by a smell that may be unpleasant to individuals at close proximity. This is because for a long time, at the genetic level, the human brain has perceived the scent of burning as a threat to health, therefore it causes negative emotions. Proceeding from this a smoker in a crowd of people will emphasize unwanted attention, feelings of disgust and even aggression. For instance, a study conducted by canadian scientists found that the smell of tobacco causes 6 out of 10 people to release norepinephrine, a hormone that provokes feelings of anger. In other words, the scent of a burnt cigarette is perceived in a negative manner by the majority of human beings.
In conclusion, I fully agree with the fact that smoking affects the human lungs of nicotine and tar to nearby people from the smell of conjugated tobacco should be banned in public places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...hat may be unpleasant to individuals at close proximity. This is because for a long time, at th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative manner" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...scent of a burnt cigarette is perceived in a negative manner by the majority of human beings. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...human beings. In conclusion, I fully agree with the fact that smoking affects the human lungs of nico...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20608108108 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83769103546 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.387725454 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160954860961 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055351093881 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540489312682 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116099846055 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644481156383 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.