A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Medical advances have influenced modern world in multiple spheres and its influence is a debatable issue in the society. One of the effects of these achievements is the fact that people’s life span has increased. Although some individuals consider this trend to be beneficial, I believe that the ability to live longer has more drawbacks.
On the one hand, higher life expectancy provides people with more opportunities in scientific and technological areas. It means that older generations studies throughout whole life and gains extensive experience. Living longer, they are able to share this valuable knowledge with the younger people. For instance, most of the distinguished professors at my university belong to the older generation, but they still have much experience to share with their students. Thus, prolonged lifetime allows humans to achieve technological breakthroughs simpler as they receive instructions from previous generation.
On the other hand, I am more inclined to the opinion that striving for immortality is the main reason of overpopulation. Along with a rising birth rate it will lead to inevitable, appalling consequences. If this trend continues, humanity will run out of precious recourses such as food, water, which will definitely affect the global economy. Moreover, these consequences are already happening in modern world. For example, China is one of the countries with an increased lifespan. Due to this a huge number of people lacks housing and has to live in substandard conditions. Thereby, if humans try to be immortal, they should be aware of possible drawbacks.
Even though many people argue that high life expectancy brings undeniable benefits to the society, I still believe that it is the reason of many current issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, still, thus, as to, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42960288809 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03124437159 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631768953069 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7782822498 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172664771371 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487927366012 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454887620278 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912069016582 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418463435715 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.