Some people believe that rich countries should provide poorer countries. Do you agree or disagree?
Wealth has always been distributed inequally among different countries. Some people claim that wealthy nations ought to render assistance to destitute governments. I completely agree with this statement and believe that countries should support each another to make the world the place where humanity can live in safety and comfort.
First of all, in poor states citizens suffer more than the government due to the lack of money in the budget. Thereby, in indigent countries a large amount of people cannot afford to social amenities and even they could starve to death. This means that rich states ought to financially assistance indigent ones to give people opportunity for existence. For instance, the USA, the United Kingdom and France have been humanitarian aid to many African countries because there practically 70% of citizens do not own houses and eat garbage. In other words, governments should allocate funds to support poor governments for making better the life of the people.
Secondly, developed economy and wealth can be the crucial factor to start a war. Therefore, some indigent countries can create a bloc, then unsheathe the sword against affluent state and after the victory deprive it of wealth. It means that every country’s economy needs foreign investments for the development and stability in the world. For example, in history practically all wars had been caused by the crave of affluence that led to disastrous consequences. Thus, financial support for poor countries is necessity for rich states to save stability in relationships.
In summary, I hold the view that affluent countries should provide poorer states in order for people alive and heathy and keep the peace in the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...practically all wars had been caused by the crave of affluence that led to disastrous con...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in summary, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70256933153 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610909090909 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3541174963 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.714285714 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269150735611 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807570364107 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068579470507 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171358141194 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455303566574 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.