The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
Do you agree with this statement?
Over the past thousands years the question regarding aid to arts has been debatable among the people. However, nowadays authorities provide a lot of money to art but individuals believe that it is waste of finances. I totally support the government and believe that arts are so necessary in each life.
Firstly, any genres of art inspire people and it aids them in obtaining high thinking. In other words, art is incredibly crucial for everyone who can think and imagine something serious in comparison to people who lack imagination. Therefore, art serves as an inspiration for people to create anything that they feel in themselves; it can be a wide range of creations whether it is music or art. For example, my friend whose name is John composes music, he derives inspiration from the depths of the soul and embodies it in music. Thus, some situations that inspired one person can be an incentive for them to commence art.
Secondly, the art is the same industry such as doctors or educators. Respectively why they cannot obtain assistance from the authorities? Likewise, the art must be supported by the government due to the fact that it also bestows abundant useful creations. For example, from the origin of humanity people drew on the rocks what they crave to receive, whether it is mammoth or a fire. Hence, the art has always been really crucial and it has to be supported by the country leaders. Thus, numerous artists choose to become these industry workers since it offers great opportunities for growth. People always thought about the situations regarding political crisis in Russia.
To conclude, I strongly agree with the statement that elected officials should provide financial support and encourage such industry as art.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, really, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04482758621 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7133110907 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596551724138 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2711357253 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.4375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151537739819 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494346566428 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427676536505 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105072604128 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363602207028 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.