Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons. Do you agree or disagree?
The environmental situation has been a highly debatable topic for decades. Some people believe that current issues become too huge to be addressed without participation of elected officials. I strongly agree with this opinion since preservation of nature is expensive for individuals as well as not profitable for them.
Conservation of environment is a complicated process that requires not only keeping the amount of incoming toxins steady, but also discarding pollutants that are already in water, soil and air, which costs exorbitantly for personal implementation. Therefore, the government can be considered as the unique source of finances for Earth cleaning. On top of that, most of the specific machinery for hazardous waste recycling is owned by public authorities. For example, according to recent studies of Moscow State University, the reduction of greenhouse effect in the eastern part of Russia would cost approximately one third of the GDP, which makes it affordable only for state budget. In other words, only legislators possess enough resources to handle global warming.
In addition to the above-mentioned issue, preservation of environment is not beneficial for manufacturers since the decrease in emissions increases production expenses making which in its turn make products less competitive on a market. Hence, only senators are able to enforce production lines modification in favour of nature conservation. For instance, the limits on vehicles’ emissions have reduced air pollution in Germany for by eighty percent. Thus, legislation is a valuable tool that is held by national leaders in managing environmental situation.
In conclusion, I undoubtedly believe that only governments hold sufficient financial and influential resources to reduce nature pollution in modern societies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74444444444 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26001885088 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67037037037 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8751972916 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.307692308 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0758994521433 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290180986575 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350410516244 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0459861273986 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459953677569 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.