The government should ban smoking in all public places, even though this would restrict some other people's freedoms. Do you agree or disagree?
The question regarding the governmental interference in people’s life has always been highly debatable in all the societies. It is argued that the government should ban smoking in all public places, even though this would restrict some other people's freedoms. I totally agree with this statement and believe that the discussed initiative influences human beings in society.
Firstly, cigarettes affect not only smokers, but also people in close proximity. This is because toxic substances contained in a cigarette pose a huge threat to people’s health owing to the fact that nicotine is a highly addictive and harmful chemical. Therefore, inhaling the cigarette smoke is considered harmful for a person caring about their health. For example, according to a study conducted by the Russian University of Medicine, 75% of family members of smokers developed chronic diseases within 15 years of passive smoking. Thus, smokers must use specially-designated places for consuming nicotine.
Secondly, smoking people generate bad smell around them. This means that person following smoker or standing next to can’t enjoy fresh air. Moreover, this fact can influence negatively on communications between people because non-smokers will have to frown or turn away from the interlocutor. According to communication theory, unpleasant smell is one of the main factors of bad conversation. In other words, people do not have to consume cigarettes in public places if they want to make a business or impress a non-smoking person.
In conclusion, considering the facts that smokers affect other people by toxic substances containing in smoke and bad smell of cigarettes, the government should ban smoking in public places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...ct not only smokers, but also people in close proximity. This is because toxic substances conta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt should ban smoking in public places.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56273764259 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02821097892 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638783269962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1682685203 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340959553096 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109898177242 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155161013994 0.0667982634062 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222772735822 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136546171929 0.056905535591 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.