The government should ban smoking in all public places, even though this would restrict some other people’s freedoms. Do you agree or disagree?
The question of relations between the government and people has always been debatable in all the societies. According to the statement the smoking should been forbid in all public places. I completely agree with this and believe that smokers will can smoke only in special rooms.
Firstly, even the passive smoking is negative and brings deseases for persons. This is because the smoke affects to respiratory system unpositive and leaves fractions in lungs. If a person stays near a group of smokers , he or she will consume 100 000 different gases from smoke. Therefore even passive smokers begin to have pulmonary diseases. In other words, a big part of population suffers from illness.
Secondly, some people have allergic reactions on the smoke. It means that the freedom of this persons would been restrict. Proceeding from this, they would been afraid and avoided public places. For instance, in Russia there are 5% of population which have this. Thus people which have allergic reactions can not lead normal lifestyle.
In conclusion, I totally agree that the authorities should ban the smoking in all public places because it would be positive for a big part of population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have been' or 'be'?
Suggestion: have been; be
...ing to the statement the smoking should been forbid in all public places. I complete...
^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...affects to respiratory system unpositive and leaves fractions in lungs. If a pers...
^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...f a person stays near a group of smokers , he or she will consume 100 000 differen...
^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ume 100 000 different gases from smoke. Therefore even passive smokers begin to have pulm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...the smoke. It means that the freedom of this persons would been restrict. Proceeding...
^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have been' or 'be'?
Suggestion: have been; be
... that the freedom of this persons would been restrict. Proceeding from this, they wo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'restricted'.
Suggestion: restricted
... the freedom of this persons would been restrict. Proceeding from this, they would been ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have been' or 'be'?
Suggestion: have been; be
...trict. Proceeding from this, they would been afraid and avoided public places. For i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 194.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14432989691 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55863005751 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613402061856 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 506.74238477 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8522162606 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.2857142857 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8571428571 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351786701475 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1084690418 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706328418357 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204277729969 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058466811452 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.