The government should ban smoking in all public places, even though this would restrict some other people’s freedoms. Do you agree or disagree?
Humanity has been consuming tobacco from ancient times. However, nowadays smoking ought to be prohibited by the authorities in all public areas. I completely agree with this statement and believe that this action will be a great boon for our society.
First of all, smoking damages people’s health and entails serious consequences. Moreover , some individuals have allergy and asthma, thus they are susceptible to tobacco odor that can trigger and allergic attack. To continue , according to the results reports of World Health Organization, 70% of people on the Earth are allergy suffers and after a contact with the smell of cigarettes they can be hospitalized or even die.Furthermore, scientists have proved that tobacco odor is regarded as more deleterious to non-smokers than to humans who consume it. In other words, the government should forbid consumption of cigarettes in public areas due to it damages dwellers’ health
In addition, smoking in public places restricts liberty of individuals who do not smoke. To start with, when adults consume tobacco among other people, they show a third-rate example of behavior for offsprings. Besides, people throw away cigarette butts everywhere after smoking, therefore they pollute the environment and create unpleasant look of the city . For instance, according to Institute of Medicine of Russia, 65% of the world’s population is non-smokers who are against smoking in social areas. Thus, the authorities ought to defend the rights of majority.
In conclusion, I hold the view that the government should forbid consuming cigarettes in public spaces, because it damages non-smokers’ health and violate their rights. To my mind this measure can make our society better
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this action will be a great boon for our society. First of all, smoking damage...
^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d entails serious consequences. Moreover , some individuals have allergy and asthm...
^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...trigger and allergic attack. To continue , according to the results reports of Wor...
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...es they can be hospitalized or even die.Furthermore, scientists have proved that tobacco od...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 626, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should forbid consumption of cigarettes in public areas due to it damages dwelle...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...damages dwellers’ health In addition, smoking in public places restricts liber...
^^
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le throw away cigarette butts everywhere after smoking, therefore they pollute th...
^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t and create unpleasant look of the city . For instance, according to Institute of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, look, moreover, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in other words, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4776119403 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94653085676 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623134328358 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.3233544721 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.923076923 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6923076923 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21722740606 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694127005297 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735053350916 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122285697329 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156756118476 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.