People are now living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short period of time and then thrown away.
What are the causes of this and what problems does it cause?
The question of the appropriateness of using disposable things has always been relevant. Nowadays, it is becoming popular to abandon reusable products for the sake of short-term ones. This essay will discuss the major reason of the trend of premature throwing away and propose viable issues that can be caused by this widespread phenomenon.
One of the biggest trigger for predominance of “throwaway society” lower prices for short-lived items. This means that reusable products are made from higher quality and more complexly structured materials, the production of which takes more resources. Therefore, prices for more stable and durable things are much higher due to the complexity of manufacturing. For example, to make a disposable cup, there is a need for cellulose from paper and a little polyethylene so that the cup does not get wet, while a reusable cup needs much more plastic, plastic structure fixers, paint and stabilizers. In other words, cheap materials give rise to cost-effective products whose price makes disposable products more preferable.
One of the common consequences of using disposable items is harm to the environment. This is because This is because disposable products need to be made in large quantities, more short-lived materials are needed, more substances will have to decompose, more toxins are released when decomposed into the soil and air. For instance, Delivery Club, one of the main players in the food delivery market in Russia, delivers 2 million orders per month, and each order up to a kilogram of plastic, which will decompose for a hundred years, releasing toxic substances into the air, soil and water. Thus, long-term fixtures will reduce the amount of toxic materials produced.
This essay shed light on the cause of why people prefer single-use products and offered a feasible problems that can be arise by displacing the multi-use things in everyday life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...gle-use products and offered a feasible problems that can be arise by displacing the mul...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31147540984 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88324073393 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583606557377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0867878922 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193931383582 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703575187596 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602200730321 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1329872906 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496154083763 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.