There has been a remarkable increase in the number of countries, which use fossil fuels as an energy source, while another section of the world thinks that renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar should be encouraged. This essay will delve both sides of this view before drawing a reasonable conclusion. I definitely agree that renewable sources ought to be encouraged due to their benefits, such as cleaner environment and their lower prices.
Admittedly, positive implications of natural energy sources are often discussed in terms of two key areas, which are less air pollution and prices. Perhaps the main advantage of natural energy sources is that they are more environmentally than fossil fuels. According to a report published by the New York Times, ordinary cars release 56 meter-cubes CO2 per day, which in turn leads to serious health problems, such as COPD, asthma, and even lung cancer. Secondly, alternative energy sources are cheaper than other sources because they can easily be produced thanks to the sun, winds, and even vawes. Thus, natural sources are useful not only for environment but also for countries’ butgets.
Despite these arguments, negative aspects of alternative energy sources should not be underestimated. Some polar region countries, such as New Zealand and Antarctica are not appropriate to use these energies owing to their locations. A good illustration of this is that Russia can use neither wind nor the sun in order to energy produce because of its geographic location. Furthermore, even though a number of measures have been taken to tackle enormous expenditures of solar energy systems, the problem could not be solved yet. Hence, natural energy sources might be perilous for countries’ economies, therefore, the governments ought to be prudent concerning these sources.
In conclusion, the decision as to whether alterrnative sources of energy should be encouraged must be taken in the context of the entire authorities. However, my personal view is that renewable sources have more advantages than drawbacks because of environmentally friendly and prices.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ources. In conclusion, the decision as to whether alterrnative sources of energy should b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4186746988 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95036078404 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2852503022 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.933333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407622371421 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133049429388 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613571001368 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243483899443 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491702039714 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.