In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
In the development of technology, automatic cars without drivers are expected to become more common in the next few years. Personally, I claim the drawbacks beyond some benefits that this tendency brings to humans.
On the one hand, the supporters of driverless point out that there is a decrease in the number of traffic accidents when using the technology. This is because people are usually distracted by some factors such as messages or notifications in the process of driving while the automatic cars are designed and follow a certain system that is unable to affect by any distractions. However, this problem can be addressed if the government put more regulations on driving and the drivers always put all their concentration when taking part in roads.
On the other hand, the dark sides of the driverless seem to outweigh the advantage. One of the major disadvantages is that humans can control and solve problems in emergencies while automatic cars are not designed to handle any sudden issues in all these cases. To illustrate, when meeting the traffic jams, people are able to find another road for traveling which contributes to time-saving; whereas, the driverless cars are set to follow certain roads so the passengers have to wait for a long time until the traffic congestions are finished. Another obvious drawback is that there is a huge amount of money spent on this kind of car. In order to ensure the accurate operation of the automatic cars, there is a need to have periodic repairs and necessary equipment replacement which are so costly.
In conclusion, even though driverless also bring the advantage of the decrease in the number of accidents, I believe the drawbacks are greatly outweighed by the lack of ability to handle emergent situations and money-consuming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...llow a certain system that is unable to affect by any distractions. However, this problem...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06418918919 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90304547463 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.9579969692 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.272727273 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154263120608 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513381600163 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345500408563 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080294870962 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407969931161 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.