In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of diverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages.
Nowadays, a new tendency of driverless vehicles has been appeared. In addition, in the future all cars and other automobiles will be driverless and only passengers will be traveling inside. In my opinion, I think that the merits of this development outweigh the downsides.
On the one hand, one of the main advantages is that automation vehicles such as cars, buses, and trucks will be more safe and lead to a decrease in the number of the traffic accidents. This is due to the fact that many drivers now drive while they are tired or they might feel sleepy, also, many do not obey traffic laws. For example a recent research shows that only one out of ten self-driving automobiles have had accidents. Furthermore, driverless cars provide people opportunities to do things while they are on the way instead of driving.
On the other hand, several disadvantages could be there as well. Firstly, this trend might increase the unemployment rate as a result of the decreasing number of drivers. Morover, the annual maintenance of these high technology vehicles might cost high. For instance, the technology of these automobiles is not highly known between the maintenance companies and requires long hours of work, thus, this might be expensive; however, thanks to the AI technology that would really help in this field and decrease the cost in the future.
In conclusion, in the next decades, more driveless vehicles might exist where only people traveling inside them are passengers. This essay discussed both the upsides and downsides, and why the advantages are superior.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...y do not obey traffic laws. For example a recent research shows that only one out of ten self-dri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, really, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08076923077 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80842719571 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2858093009 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.615384615 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8461538462 7.06120827912 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349373225693 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110351572595 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114623764388 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212524734424 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134039267585 0.056905535591 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.