You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic.
Some people think living in big cities is bad for people’s health.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
In this modern era, more people tend to move from countrysides to live in metropolitan cities. Therefore, some believe that living in urban areas is bad for humans’ health. In my opinion, I disagree with this aforementioned statement to a large extend; however, there are some factors which make their opinion justified.
On the one hand, eventhough the number of individuals settling in the cities is increasing more and more which causes congestion and pollution to the city, there are facilities that could control these places’ effects on human beings’ immunity system. Firstly, a developed healthcare system and highly experienced healthworkers would provide the people who live there more care and attention. In addition, fitness amenities are everywhere available such as gyms, and various sport centres. All those are due to the opportunites that are easily accessable to the people comparing to the countrysides. For instance, many of large companies in Toronto have their own highly equipped fitness centre so that their employees might use it after their work shift is done.
On the other hand, suberbs could be a little bit healtheir for humans. This is because the human beings there plants their crops without using any chemicals that are harmful for the body’s immunity, also, not to mention the fresh air due to the lack of vehicles and carbon dioxide use. For example, the world health organization has recently admitted that one of the causes that cancer is being widespread is the utilization of chemicals that speed up plants’ growth. Yet, these days many countrysides are being polluted as well.
In conclusion, many think that settlement in cities could be harmful for humans. This essay argued why living in the urban areas would not be that bad, and how their point of view is reasonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... On the other hand, suberbs could be a little bit healtheir for humans. This is because t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16835016835 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70872020369 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.021679477 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.642857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160891665747 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592238539899 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447765748545 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10844972961 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461101307465 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.