In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other
planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement ?
In recent decades, global warming has been receiving a great deal of media attention. Although the idea of coexistence between climate change and human appears reasonable, this can not be viewed as the ultimate approach for humankind to combat climate change.
There are many reasons why money should not be poured into space research. First, the cost of space projects is prohibitively expensive, many nations could not be able to afford in the long run. In fact, launching shuttles into space needs an enormous amount of money, which leads to budget deficits in many countries. Second, gas emissions stem from space shuttles can increase the greenhouse effect. The poisonous and radioactive emissions produced by the explosion can excessively leave carbon footprint into the air, which directly correlates with the intensification of global warming.
It may sounds more economically for humankind to take action on global warming. First, the financial costs to alleviate environmental problems are more reasonably priced. Instead of using money to search for nearby earth analogs, for example, governments can use that money to invest in many key fields, such as health care and education, which can help many countries to achieve sustainable development. Second, if financial resources are used to develop advanced environmentally-friendly technologies, governments could cut down on emissions from factories. Producing eco-friendly alternatives or generating green power resources, for example, could reduce the reliance on fossil fuels.
In conclusion, actively fight climate change must be high on the government agenda. Corporations and authorities should collect the information on a national scale to see the whole picture and take steps to deal with environmental problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65055762082 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15952764579 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646840148699 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.99723179 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116063344758 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040498145232 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039306410763 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653244264319 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119220866109 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.