It is now convinient for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with this development?
In recent decades, there have been a growing trend towards traveling to remote natural areas for a variety of purposes. Although this trend might be of great concern to some environmental activists, scientists and thrillseekers should still be encouraged to study and explore there.
Scientists in different branches need to travel to remote natural environment like South Pole to study and protect it. This benefits not only those who do the research themselves but also the society as a whole as there will be solutions to many global problems such as climate change. Second, most scientists travel to remote natural areas in efforts to learn how to protect them from other humans. In fact, if no pertinent data about the interaction of humans and the environment is collected for research and made known to the public, even innocent people can inadvertently damage the areas.
There are also a number of benefits for tourists traveling to isolated natural environment. One of those benefits is that natural areas offer one-of-a-kind traveling experience to visitors. For example, those who decide to take a vacation to South Pole will be able to immerse in the wilderness and the atmosphere that are entirely different from the world they know. In addition, by staying inside a natural environment, tourists will be able to develop a higher appreciation for nature. In fact, a large number of tourists and students have chosen to become environmental advocates or even activists after a trip to the wilderness, which helps raise the public awareness on the issue.
In conclusion, traveling to remotes natural areas benefits students, scientists and the world at large in a variety of ways. As long as there is no disruption to the original state of nature, everyone should be welcomed
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-20 | ThanhTam21 | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-20 | Duyenle2606 | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-06 | driverhiepkhachvnteam | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-02 | AnhanhThu | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-26 | lap1604 | 56 | view |
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is now convinient for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do you agree or disagree with this development 56
- Nowadays there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...as can promote environmental awareness. In fact, some visitors decide to become en...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...experienced the trip to remote areas. In conclusion, scientists and tourists sho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, as for, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48953974895 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05410670977 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523012552301 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8853345006 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.923076923 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208906664227 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897716041738 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507167409278 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140659173889 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119823842614 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...as can promote environmental awareness. In fact, some visitors decide to become en...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...experienced the trip to remote areas. In conclusion, scientists and tourists sho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, as for, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48953974895 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05410670977 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523012552301 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8853345006 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.923076923 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208906664227 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897716041738 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507167409278 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140659173889 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119823842614 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.