It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural
environment, such as the South Pole. Do you agree or disagree with this
development?
In recent decades, there have been a growing trend towards traveling to
remote natural areas for a variety of purposes. Although this trend might be
of great concern to some environmental activists, scientists and thrillseekers should still be encouraged to study and explore there.
Scientists in different branches need to travel to remote natural environment
like South Pole to study and protect it. This benefits not only those who do
the research themselves but also the society as a whole as there will be
solutions to many global problems such as climate change. Second, most
scientists travel to remote natural areas in efforts to learn how to protect
them from other humans. In fact, if no pertinent data about the interaction of
humans and the environment is collected for research and made known to
the public, even innocent people can inadvertently damage the areas.
There are also a number of benefits for tourists traveling to isolated natural
environment. One of those benefits is that natural areas offer one-of-a-kind
traveling experience to visitors. For example, those who decide to take a
vacation to South Pole will be able to immerse in the wilderness and the
atmosphere that are entirely different from the world they know. In addition,
by staying inside a natural environment, tourists will be able to develop a
higher appreciation for nature. In fact, a large number of tourists and
students have chosen to become environmental advocates or even activists
after a trip to the wilderness, which helps raise the public awareness on the
issue.
In conclusion, traveling to remotes natural areas benefits students, scientists
and the world at large in a variety of ways. As long as there is no disruption
to the original state of nature, everyone should be welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 18, column 42, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...igher appreciation for nature. In fact, a large number of tourists and students have chosen to b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 22, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...se the public awareness on the issue. In conclusion, traveling to remotes natura...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, still, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25938566553 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86041849493 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542662116041 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7244658305 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.538461538 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.38176352705 525% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297576841921 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107441292644 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713578368777 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788616992114 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802461466308 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.