Some people think that nuclear energy is better than other sources of power for meeting ever-increasing global needs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, it is argued that nuclear power is better than other sources of power, such as natural resources, for meeting growing global demands. In my opinion, I partly disagree with this view.
Nuclear power is the current dominant source of energy for several reasons. First, it can provide a constant energy supply without any interruption, while renewable power generation, such as sun and wind, would be affected by weather patterns. According to BBC News, nuclear energy accounts for 10-15% of the world’s electricity production, which plays an indispensable role in the electricity supply for human’s daily life. Second, the nuclear source known as “green” energy is environmentally friendly. To be more precise, it does not release exhaust fumes and emissions contributing to the greenhouse effect and posing a severe threat to the entire world, into the environment and the atmosphere.
On the other hand, I would argue that nuclear energy would not be the best choice for electricity supply. First, if waste disposal systems are improper, radioactive waste will spread out power plants, which is an escalation in high levels of radiation and put the human and ecosystems, such as aquatic animals, in great danger. In fact, there are several nuclear accidents, such as in Chernobyl in 1986 in Ukraine, emitting a large amount of radiation into the environment and leading to millions of people and animals’ death and fatal genetic diseases, such as agent orange. Second, the nuclear resource is a non-renewable energy source and is predicted to run out in the next 100 years. Therefore, it is essential for the government to apply for technological advances in stable renewable power generation in order to administer cost-effective electricity supplies for the people and meet the growing global demands.
In conclusion, although nuclear energy has recorded a dominant position in the world’s electricity supply, I do believe that it would be unsafe and should be substituted with renewable resources.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94033141996 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560747663551 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2309118568 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.692307692 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272650801964 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10665588792 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860088111193 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179359121705 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800961396086 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.