In the future, will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is true that in the future people can not buy newspapers or books because they can read everything in social networks. I completely agree that this helpful than reading books in real.
There are several reasons why I agree with that. Firstly, when you have not time for reading in the library and you want to read book, in this situation people able to read books in the internet electronic version. Secondly, it leads to more convenient, helps save time and can keep many electronic version books in computer or telephone. Besides, they can read online without paying for it. In the internet we can read the newspapers in any language from any country in the world. Finally, you can watch films of many books.
On the other hand, it can lead to harm for human body. For example, when people using computer or telephone they can damage to eye light. Consequently, they should to go to the hospital for eye treatment. Another reason why I disagree is that when you read the books in computer suddenly a message may come to you and it will make you think of something else. Furthermore, you do not read the book to the end. Moreover, when in your computer have not charging you cannot read books or magazines electronic version and it leads to you may not be able to learn many things.
In conclusion, in the future nobody will not buy printed version of the books because they will be able to read everything by using internet without paying for. In my opinion, it is more convenient than reading published newspapers or books.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63736263736 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44939114201 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.16442113 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.125 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412921668516 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138808798857 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119274072505 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294221420294 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868917899183 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.58950901804 77% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.