Nowadays, with the development of the economy. The government spends a large part of the budget on arts. Many individuals complain that government should investment in public service instead of arts. Personally, I do not agree with the idea but I think arts and public service are equal important to invest.
Here are some reasons to support why the government should spend money on arts. To start, Arts places like theaters, museums, and galleries are the best places for residents to spend their free time. People can choose the places to go based on their interests. Arts improve the quality of our daily life. Moreover, Arts play a significant role in a nation’s society. In other words, Arts is a symbol of the culture. For instance, painting and music have expressed the culture of some areas in a certain period. Hence art is the heritage which should be protected carefully. Lastly, Arts places attract sufficient tourists therefore to boost the economy. Local residents can benefit from the consumption of visitors.
Despite this, Public services are also important to the locals. Such like medical support would improve the rate of social health; Governments fund can save people from the poverty; The free education gives chance to everyone to be educated. These public services will increase the happiness of the society. It is the key factors to building a successful nation.
To sum up, there are many clear benefits to a country with investing in arts. However, Spending money on public services creates a satisfied life. I believe in the future people will live a better life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ture of some areas in a certain period. Hence art is the heritage which should be pro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07169811321 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62276367301 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57358490566 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 29.9562795555 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.0 106.682146367 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.619047619 20.7667163134 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256488081469 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686742221999 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852740537 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172501202779 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107274538064 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.