Scientific research is expanding worldwide and more people are participating in this area, and. In today’s society, undertaking these researches is one of the most contentious issue whether it has to be under the official authorities or private groups. However, I believe governments and official authorities should have the predominant responsibility and main superintendence on it.
Firstly, governments tend to be dramatically more efficient in making a real difference in the lives of real people. Because they are accountable to the public whom are paying taxes for such exercises. For example, solar energy and space researches that granted an immense improvement for publics overall life. Therefore, government’s achievements in scientific researches will be available for all even for future generation to keep progressing towards success and humanity development.
On the other hand, Private industry won’t make the investments for pure science, and it is too insistent on immediate returns on investments, so that private investors will not devote money to research that lacks an obvious commercial application. This is usually said in such a way as to suggest that private investors are vulgar materialists, too faithless to be patient for the long-term rewards for research or too ignoble to approve of knowledge for its own sake. For example, drugs’ companies that work in finding new cures for diseases and ailments, and then offering it to the public with huge prices that cannot be afforded by the majority of people.
In conclusion, I believe government authorities are the right associates for implementing scientific researches. While Official authorities will work for the benefits of public taking into consideration the whole community’s prosperity and sustainability, private groups invest in such research with the need commercial results is paramount. In future, I think more combination and coordination between the efforts of authorities and private sector in science industry to ensure the maximum use of skillful and dexterous staff.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wards success and humanity development. On the other hand, Private industry won&...
^^^^
Line 4, column 348, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...e need commercial results is paramount. In future, I think more combination and coordinat...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66560509554 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32637328324 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589171974522 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7265705094 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.846153846 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244731147335 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909374956928 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372778711395 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153258450015 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241867987439 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.