Government should pay any of the parents of very young children to look after them at houses.what would be the advantages and disadvantages of this policy?
It goes without saying that, in many countries, the policy of funding the parents of little ones is becoming increasingly popular. To look after the off-springs at their houses, either of the parents should be paid by the government. This essay will discuss the advantages and also the disadvantages of this trend.
There are numerous of benefits of implementing this scheme, which are both obvious and evident.The first is that many of the parents are not capable of feeding their children properly. If government will aid them financially to introduce a balanced diet at this stage, these children will not combat any terrible disease caused by nourishments. Second, if the children will stay in homes rather than any orphanage, it will nurture them with good manners, and keep far away from bad company. Overall, implementing this policy will prevent the children from food deficiency diseases and bad society.
If we consider the drawbacks associated with paying the parents for their children's nurture, they can be both predictable and unpredictable. The main issue is that this economic help will make them reliable, while they might become derelict from their jobs. Many parents become accustomed with this help and cannot continue with their works. In addition, it will be a burden for developing nations whose infrastructure and financial situation doesn't allow it. And, consequently unaffordable nations will fall down economically. In short, the parents will become irresponsible and poor countries will fall down.
In conclusion, this essay discussed both pros and cons of paying the parents by authorities, for children's nurture. In short, while the benefits are enormous, the drawbacks shouldn't be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mplementing this policy will prevent the children from food deficiency diseases a...
^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ts become accustomed with this help and cant continue with their works. In addition ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t continue with their works. In addition ,it will be a burden for developing natio...
^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... infrastructure and financial situation doesnt allow it. And, consequently unaffordabl...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...by authorities, for childrens nurture. In short, while the benefits are enormous,...
^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...he benefits are enormous, the drawbacks shouldnt be overlooked.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, look, second, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38007380074 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84951138715 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579335793358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7120472736 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.125 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293145698795 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931651347475 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069348051433 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187245332513 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757267540536 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.