It is recommended that regime should pay out fund on railways rather than roads. I accord with this statement due to fare rates and comfortable for mature people.
To commence with the view of disagreement, roads can broken with heavy vehicles. To elaborate it, nowadays humans have their own transport and they prefer to go anywhere with their own on vehicle so, if administration focus only railway than roads can be damage and increase the cases of accidents. Hence, people can lose their life with serious damage on the road.
Shifting towards the view of agreement, it is very cheap for poor people. To explain it, many population face poverty and they prefer to go to one city to another city by the trains. If this facility by the high authority all provided in the rural and urban areas then all society easily go on the trains. To cite an example, a survey was conducted by the railways head of department found in 2016 that all stations were open in many background places and people knew about the large city and they bought things from this cities. As a result, poor people also can enjoy the urban places environment.
In addition to this, it is comfortable for elder individuals. In other words, if government spend more money on railways and they provide good facilities and seats in the trains which is easy for the old humans and they will prefer only trains. The best corollary of this notion that a headline was published in "THE MOSCOW TIMES" newspaper revealed that 64% mature society go to anywhere because they are comfortable sit and washrooms also very neat and clean. Therefore, these facilities also increase the economy level of the any nation.
All considered, it could be said that with the help of executive poor people can survive and beneficial for the older.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... large city and they bought things from this cities. As a result, poor people also c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'places'' or 'place's'?
Suggestion: places'; place's
...t, poor people also can enjoy the urban places environment. In addition to this, it...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, then, therefore, in addition, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8424437299 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.532468209 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559485530547 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3997381214 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184152233483 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604322050647 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549851071353 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105958868136 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734025781166 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.