Traffic jam has been such a serious problem all over the world, especially in megacities, since a decade ago. While several ideas have been discussed to fix that trouble, there's an issue of whether governments should invest more on railway systems instead of roads. From my point of view, I am fully support this idea, due to the reason which will be spread out in the paragraphs below.
Firstly, train is a fast and high capacity public transport, which is able to carry a huge amount of humans and loads. Therefore, it naturally reduced the pressure on other means of transport. Moreover, its ticket price is in affordable range and one of the most benefit that train can bring is the guarantee of safety for passengers. For what have been written, I believe that railways network can play a key role in transport system in the near future.
On the other hand, some opponents prefer using road than public transport. Follow their perspectives, a vast majority of commute using vehicles on road, which will put a strain on it. Therefore, the overload in the amount of traffic participants in bottlenecks tends to be continuous stuck. Not only traffic jam, air pollution is also one of the biggest trouble from overusing private vehicles on road. The number of exhaust emissions from gasoline, which cause a costly damage to the surrounding environment, does not have a signal about stopping. Last but not least, road accidents nowadays are one of the common reasons for individual death.
In short, while there is no exact solution for these hot trend problems ( traffic jam, green house gas ), I am on the side that railway system is a decisive factor in inhibition of current transport system problem.
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ave been discussed to fix that trouble, theres an issue of whether governments should ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'costly damage'.
Suggestion: costly damage
...st emissions from gasoline, which cause a costly damage to the surrounding environment, does no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct solution for these hot trend problems traffic jam, green house gas , I am on t...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d problems traffic jam, green house gas , I am on the side that railway system is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, so, therefore, while, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89655172414 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60280639891 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644827586207 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0686581683 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.428571429 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0638061842787 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0194955025957 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033552971002 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0382330338718 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029348622857 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.