Railways and motor vehicles are considered the most popular transportation modes in most of the countries. While some people may prefer governments to pour greater financial resources into railways, I would argue that governments should also extend that support to public roads equally.
However, some opponents believe that giving finance to develop roads have several advantages. Follow their perspectives, a vast majority of commute using vehicles on road, which will put a strain on it. Therefore, the overload in the amount of traffic participants in bottlenecks tends to be continuous stuck. Not only traffic jam, air pollution is also one of the biggest trouble from overusing private vehicles on road. The number of exhaust emissions from gasoline, which cause a costly damage to the surrounding environment, does not have a signal about stopping. Last but not least, road accidents nowadays are one of the common reasons for individual death.
In contrast, train - one type of railway systems -is a fast and high capacity public transport, which is able to carry a huge amount of humans and loads. Therefore, it naturally reduced the pressure on other means of transport. Moreover, its ticket price is in affordable range and one of the most benefit that train can bring is the guarantee of safety for passengers. For what have been written, I believe that railways network can play a key role in transport system in the near future.
In short, whereas expense financial on road infrastructure can be useful, I am on the side that railway system is a decisive factor in inhibition of current transport system problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'costly damage'.
Suggestion: costly damage
...st emissions from gasoline, which cause a costly damage to the surrounding environment, does no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, in contrast, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16981132075 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80912358338 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630188679245 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1784962561 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.384615385 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.056367737777 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0179527324378 0.084324248473 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261799626058 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0390017981287 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315402530386 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.