Some people argued that governments should allocate a budget on railways more than roads. I completely agree with this group because I see more benefits in this way like reduce air pollution and safer traveling.
In this essay, I explain my point of view. Some people believe the best way to commute is by cars especially own cars. It's convenient and easy to use, which means every person who has a driver's license and a car could travel everywhere he wants, and also others who do not have their own car or driver's license can use the bus. what this group neglected is that these vehicles burn fossil fuels, which pollute the air, and also bus is the more eco-friendly vehicle but it also has exhausted fumes.
In the other hand, other people believe that the governments should invest in the railways. Traveling by train on the railways is safer than traveling by car on the roads. There is less human error in traveling by train. They use high-edge computers to control trains, while most cars do not have even a run-on-the-mill processor, so trains are more reliable rather than cars. In addition, New generation trains are so eco-friendly, which means they use the solar panel to gain the electrical power which needs. So if the authorities spent money on railways, it will be possible to use these kinds of trains in not too far distant future. It is obvious this way have benefits for the environment, for instance, By development of roads, the number of cars will increase, which means the air pollution also increased, but by using these kinds of trains, the vast amount of greenhouse gases will decline.
In conclusion, The government should consider the outcomes of their decision, and also tried to reduce multiple problems altogether. By opting the railways instead of roads, there is more chance to reduce the number of car accidents, and also declining the vast of air pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...car or drivers license can use the bus. what this group neglected is that these vehi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82208588957 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59862846247 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527607361963 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1359392638 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153092982821 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555162921741 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480413266646 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106545826842 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621649665781 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.