Governments should spend more money on education than on recreation and sports. Do you agree or disagree?
The argument about whether governments should financially support the education side more than entertainment and sports have not been settled yet. I thoroughly agree with this opinion and think that it is more worthwhile to spend money on education rather than sports and amusement.
Firstly, I believe that spending money on education is like a future investment for the country. How much money you will provide in the educational field the more income will return to the country. Moreover, a group of businessmen around the world invest in educated countries more than uneducated. The reason for this investment is educated countries can guarantee that investors will benefit and get more money back. Educated peoples are the main manpower of a country. For example, Our neighbor country India has developed in their IT sector significantly in the past few years. That's the reason why companies like Google , Facebook , Microsoft are coming to hire from India .
Secondly, if we give attention to academics and research then we will help grow a Civilized generation. That increases a country's development in every possible way. An educated generation is necessary for the process to come after and they are an asset for the nation. In other words, engineers play a vital role in the development of their nations by using different strategies they have learned. It is called, Engineers are the Future. Because,the positive outputs that the country can achieve from their well-educated engineers in evolving their administrations.So, this enlarges the idea that well-educated people have a beneficial impact on their Countries.
In conclusion, governments should spend a large amount of money to support educational fields other than sports and recreation.I believe that it is more beneficial to spend more money on education and research.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...or significantly in the past few years. Thats the reason why companies like Google , ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ats the reason why companies like Google , Facebook , Microsoft are coming to hire...
^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...son why companies like Google , Facebook , Microsoft are coming to hire from India...
^^
Line 3, column 678, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... Microsoft are coming to hire from India . Secondly, if we give attention to ac...
^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...It is called, Engineers are the Future. Because,the positive outputs that the country c...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...alled, Engineers are the Future. Because,the positive outputs that the country can a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...neers in evolving their administrations.So, this enlarges the idea that well-educa...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...fields other than sports and recreation.I believe that it is more beneficial to s...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38620689655 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98557376601 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555172413793 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8659831587 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351534863689 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111484197129 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132116492958 0.0667982634062 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276062842426 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166205269871 0.056905535591 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.