The graph and chart give information and forecast about the vehicle and CO2 emission in England and Wales between 2000 and 2020.
https://www.testbig.com/sites/default/files/a_4.jpg
The bar chart and line graph compared the data and prediction about the transportation and different CO2 emission between England and Wales from 2000 to 2020.
Overall, the line graph showed the number of the vehicle was increasing from 2000 to 2020. Besides, the bar chart is noticeable that the prediction about emission of vehicles as well as car, bus, van and truck were slightly change every year.
As can be seen from the bar graph, the amount of CO2 emssions of car and truck were strikingly higher than other CO2 emssions such as bus and van, the precentages of car emssion started with 20 tons emissions in 2000. Thus, truck were at around 5 tons. Bus waas accounting to under 10 tons from 2000 to 2020. Continous, the amount of different vehicles such as car, van and truck increased in 2010, at around 23 tons, 14,5 tons and 13 tons, respectively. In 2020, the amount of CO2 emssion in tons from car is increasing which has the highest amount, at around 26 tons of emission following to the emission of truck which is lower than the amount of car emission, and truck is at around 23,5 tons.
In line graph, the number of vehicles started at around 20 million in 2000. After that, it was slightly climb from 20 to under 50 million from 2000 to 2015. In 2020, the number of vehicles is reaching to 50,5 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'changed'.
Suggestion: changed
...s car, bus, van and truck were slightly change every year. As can be seen from the ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'climbed'.
Suggestion: climbed
...on in 2000. After that, it was slightly climb from 20 to under 50 million from 2000 t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, thus, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56485355649 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37287561432 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 176.041082164 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435146443515 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 506.74238477 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.60771543086 75% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4033891001 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1818181818 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201452090776 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100531815842 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867112370751 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179180233066 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991622136304 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 50.2224549098 167% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 78.4519038076 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.