A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Humans are also biologically categorized as Animals. This classification is only because of the fact the we all are mammals, we breath in the same way, we feel the pain, we have emotions and many other things are in common. Then how can someone just because of having a functional brain and a common language to speak bifurcate those mammals from us? Some people believe that this is not correct while other humans think that this is totally normal. The Essay will elaborate both the points and then will lead to a genuine opinion on the same.
Talking about exploitation to animals which is correct according to many people around the world as most of them consider that this procedure is being followed since centuries so it can be continued. If I say about those past times then, these animals were mostly used for harvesting and farming and somewhere for food too. But now the conditions have been changed as now animals are being used for Food and Research. Using of these animals extensively for food can be well explained with the following example, there is an annual festival for dogs in China where a lot of dogs are boiled live roasted live, I consider this as very brutal cause you can't punish someone for your happiness only. In India and many countries this Islam culture follows the murdering of animals for E'Id custom which is not correct from human emotions perspective too, eating Goats and Hens is fine because they are now-a-days being biologically made to eat only but eating those endangered species is not at all fine which is being followed in many villages. Talking about the other aspect which is Research, many of the tests and checks are done on innocent animals to check if the product made is fine or not. Let's take an example of testing lipsticks or some other feminine products they are still being tested on monkeys and some of them get very serious injuries because of this.
Going to the other side of this, many people do think that this is not right to exploit animals for human purpose only. These people think that equal rights should be given to these naive creatures too. There have been many campaigns and protests for not eating animals and specially the endangered ones as they are only the few that are left and we can't consume them too just for satisfying ourselves. Quite a years back there was a big protest against the using animals for testing products as they were getting injured on a daily basis but there has been no response to this seen now. There has been a campaign carried out for this Dog Festival in China on Social Media and in some live places too but there also no changes have been seen.
To Sum up, although some people think that injuring or killing animals for the sole purpose of humans is ethical but this can be demonstrated by a lot of evidences that this is not the case. I support that for some diet purposes these are important but we can consume those that are made scientifically for eating purpose only and not the ones that are not. Some strict actions should be taken out by the government to give equal rights to these non-speaking creatures too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'we'?
Suggestion: the; we
...ssification is only because of the fact the we all are mammals, we breath in the same ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... consider this as very brutal cause you cant punish someone for your happiness only....
^^^^
Line 5, column 822, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'emotions'' or 'emotion's'?
Suggestion: emotions'; emotion's
... custom which is not correct from human emotions perspective too, eating Goats and Hens ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1192, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...eck if the product made is fine or not. Lets take an example of testing lipsticks or...
^^^^
Line 9, column 351, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...y are only the few that are left and we cant consume them too just for satisfying ou...
^^^^
Line 9, column 410, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a year' or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: a year; years
...oo just for satisfying ourselves. Quite a years back there was a big protest against th...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 579, Rule ID: SCENE_SEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'scene'?
Suggestion: scene
... but there has been no response to this seen now. There has been a campaign carried ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, well, while, talking about, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 46.0 13.1623246493 349% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 55.0 24.0651302605 229% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 1615.20841683 160% => OK
No of words: 557.0 315.596192385 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64811490126 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85807034144 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31630688109 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45960502693 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 827.1 506.74238477 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3180782291 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.45 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.85 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280462467954 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970182741862 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055844856789 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175264893975 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516655333784 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.