People are having a common problem that they cannot identify what things make us be happy for livings. There are many difference methods to make them be joyful only when they know how to make it happen.
One problem is that we cannot realise the meaning of happiness so a lot of people live without their goals. However, most things in our planet can be bought by using money so they will do it in every way to earn money even working for over 12 hours a day. Nevertheless, these people do not have even a time to spend their money for making happiness and they are getting older every single day. Whereas, some who have less potential of making money, they feel upset for their bad quality of living. Many are lacking of shelters, foods or medicines. So that having money or not cannot guarantee their happiness at all.
The really considerable element is, to balance their life. As mentioned above, we will lose time when giving too much time for finding money, and without money we cannot have fundamental living. It is better for everyone to have time and money not only one. First, we have to work smart and find the work-life-balance which is suit for everyone. This will provide you like extra time to find other activities like playing sports, going holidays and staying with family. Second, we have to improve our quality of working for being more value in entrepreneurs’ sight. Our quality will directly affect to income even it takes some time to see a consequence, for example, salesman get a promotion if he could bring sales to their company continually. Finally, time and money together are enough for having happiness because we have more flexibility to do anything we like to.
In conclusion, in order to have a happy life we need to make our life balance and keep improving our quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...annot guarantee their happiness at all. The really considerable element is, to b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70846394984 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52951834653 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4114540168 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3529411765 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0921248134879 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387950659603 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028962905072 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697458108877 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119607272328 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.