Hosting international sport events
Some people think hosting a sport event is a good chance for the host country, whereas the others do not think so. In my standpoint, to hold international sport events might bring out both advantages and disadvantages. In the following essay, I would like to examine both sides of the coin.
On the one hand, there is no denying that hosting an international event could bring the host country honor and prestige as it becomes the center of attention globally. As a result, the country itself is assured of a persistent increase in recognition and tourism. For example, Beijing, the capital of China became more popular after hosting 2008 Summer Olympic. Besides, being the host of an international event could also improve the number of employment opportunities for the native. Moreover, the events also support the local economy with a huge income from tickets and telecast rights.
On the other hand, one thing that is of significance is that the host country has to use a large government budget which could be utilized somewhere else to hold the event. The local government has to pay the fee to improve the facilities and security for the host city, which could be a burden for many developing countries. The closest example is Greece, which has fallen into a huge international debt after hosting an Olympic. Furthermore, in the contrast of prestige when hosting an international event, the country might face the negative publicity if thing went wrong.
In conclusion, the cons of holding international sport events are outweighed by its pros.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02545454545 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82906753905 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552727272727 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7493783163 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49419846168 0.244688304435 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165970032706 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116527763253 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319709559805 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316993090687 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.