The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to
2010 in a particular country.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The given line chart illustrates the data of four selected materials recycled in a 28 years period starting from 1982 in a country.
In general, the figure of the four materials shared the same upward trend through the period. Besides, there was no change in their position of proportion.
It is clearly revealed from the graph that the percentage of recycled paper and cardboard was the highest rate in this period, followed by the number of glass containers. While the figure of paper things witnessed a slight decrease in 2986 after climbing to 70% in 1982, the percentage of glass containers which were recycled dropped dramatically from 50% to 40% in the first 8 years. After both recycling rate of paper things and glass containers rose significantly in the next 4 years, the paper and cardboard one went on a sharp decline and ended up with 70% in 2010 whereas this number of glass containers went up and reached its peak in 2010 with 60%.
As illustrated in the chart, the recycling rate of aluminium cans grew gradually from 5% to 45% over the period. At the same time, recycled plastics ‘s proportion experienced a very small increase after 28 years, starting with about 4% and ending with 9% in 2010.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77725118483 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60027660496 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57345971564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2335700004 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164764535272 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758548735997 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048266372889 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107051622613 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474936808847 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.