Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Recently, there is an ever-increasing phenomenon that more students opt to correspondence learning at home instead of enrolling in offline classes. From my perspective, I would have a yearning for offline classes that better-serve students rather than the indirecting one with virtual interaction.
No one can deny that distance learning brings about the upfront comfort and convenience. However, learning at home could not enable students with regular face to face contact with the affected factors as human beings namely teachers and classmates. In traditional classes, students can declare their standpoint and clarify their queries more straight-forward with their teacher, thus they receive the answers in a short span of time. Moreover, correspondence students could not approach the facilities for experimental subjects such as Physical education, Chemistry and Craft. For example, if students evoke to embark the academic journey at home, their accessibility to volleyball and football for PE class as well as do Chemical experiments is apparently constraining. Thus the aftermath of unfully equipped beings may crop up.
We may also point out the indisputable fact that interaction and scholastic rivalry with classmates in traditional classes are a great stimulus for perpetuating success where, in stark contrast, online classes are out of proportion. Were there some excellent students in the class, the others would have the motivation to make efforts in their study with the view to catch up. Furthermore, school makes the ground for students to provoke new relationships with their peers and teachers, who supports them with fully-equipped social skills. For instance, when students emerge in sport clubs and group assignments, they ought to acquire how to cooperate with others efficiently.
All in all, every coin has two sides. Distance-learning may exert regarding positive impacts on the education trending. However, within the missing holes of distance-learning, the contemporary programme may fill up those holes, which proved its vitality to be taken consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- Proportion of computer ownership 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- process of recycling rain water
- recycling rain water 100
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 771, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...experiments is apparently constraining. Thus the aftermath of unfully equipped being...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66878980892 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24186927844 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652866242038 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3818309402 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20776089795 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064121761886 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458562993799 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116670663704 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616077584958 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.