Today, the indispensable role of TV on people's lives is an important topic. Children are the most vulnerable groups of society that are exposed to the bad effects of inappropriate Tv programs. How to decrease the negative effects of watching Tv on children, is a challenging subject. Informed media's specialist and parental controls are two methods that can probably reduce the harmful effects of Tv programs on children.
Firstly, Tv programs should be checked by specialists to determine if they are suitable for children. For example, they should be categorized for different age groups. Adult's program containing nudity or violence should display late at nights. Therefore, indirect playback control and classification by age lead to peace of mind for parents as it contributes to better use of television programs for children.
On the other hand, parental control is an appropriate method for decreasing destructive effects of media on children. When children watch Tv they don’t experience it as grown-ups do. As an example, scary visual images, sexual imagery and even advertisement could affect their mental performance. Parents can control these effects by choosing educational programs and limiting watch hours for their children. Thus, if parents be more cautious the negative influences of Tv are limited.
In conclusion, using smart strategies for controlling negative effects like parental control and Tv specialists, the benefits of Television for learning and developing children's talent can be seen. With this trend, not only educational programs but also fun items could improve mental abilities of children.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.552 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00958468896 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7074533147 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144220340974 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056634428197 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317640900799 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937143182076 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165315379858 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.