Human activity has had adverse effects on plants and animals. Some people think that its too late to solve this issue, while others believe that necessary steps should be taken to overcome this problem.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The existence of flora and fauna is in threat because of the adversarial works of mankind. According to some people, it is a challenge to get rid of this situation but others think that proper activities will help to move out from this difficulty. In my opinion, if everyone becomes aware then it is not impossible to save the nature and its creatures.
First of all, deforestation and animal killing have already created ruthless impact on environment for a long time. Because of global warming, ices of north and south poles are melting and sea levels are rising. In addition, for business purpose, hunters are hunting wild animal without any limit and destroying their comfort zones. For this reason, number of animals are decreasing. So, if cutting and killing trend can be stopped then environmental calamities will be reduced.
On the adverse side, prompt action and awareness should be the best tools to save plants and animals. To reduce the effects of global warming, various projects, such as, limiting controlling carbon dioxide gas emission project and tree planting project etcetera, have been taken by the government. To give protection to animals, in many countries, such as India, Bangladesh, wild animal hunting is banned. Beside this, different kinds of public awareness programs are arranged by environment and wildlife saving organizations. Clearly, all these efforts will help to restore the beauty of nature.
In conclusion, loss of trees and animals have created a lot of problems in our environment but it is not too late. Proper initiatives will obviously help to save the nature. I think, it is high time to work together to save our beautiful world and its breath taking natural beauties.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 598, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l help to restore the beauty of nature. In conclusion, loss of trees and animals...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12411347518 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72721779762 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63475177305 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8442549593 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3125 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173331504194 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483214107977 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500234558697 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997152361449 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443894055526 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.