On the planet, all living things deserve to live as humans. However, some human activities bring negative consequences to these. Therefore, some people state that this phenomenon cannot be changed, whereas their counterparts believe that some measures would be imposed to tackle this issue. This essay discusses both sides of the argument, followed by my own view.
According to some, who believe that harmful human activity cannot change towards plants and animals. Since bygone days some kinds of animals have been suffered. To illustrate, horse riding, which is the popular competitive game, is organised in Russia, China and India. Still, none has yet taken strict regulations to curb such type of illicit activities because, by this sport, governments revenue would increase. Similarly, some logging companies demolish thousands of trees yearly to construct companies, so, these harmful human activities continuous that some people think it cannot be regulated.
On the other hand, there are specific remedies which might curb these negative impacts on plants and animals. To begin with, bullfights, for example, these were Forbidden by the Indian government due to people were harassing bulls and oxen vigorously, as a result, National administration imposed a rule on banning Bullfights. Moreover, goats which were used for betting in local festivities were intercepted by State governments. Similarly, nowadays, the nation's administrators impose rules and regulations to preserve plans safely. For example, Nalla Malla, a vast forest, situated in Andhra Pradesh, is in monitored strictly by forest officers. Thus, there are many remedial measures which can curb the negative impact on animals and plants.
In summary, even though some plants and animals are suffered immensely, there are many strict regulations to curb all these untoward circumstances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the argument, followed by my own view. According to some, who believe that harm...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nnot change towards plants and animals. Since bygone days some kinds of animals have ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome people think it cannot be regulated. On the other hand, there are specific re...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, similarly, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in summary, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90842490842 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42551756547 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1113508368 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.214285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277196728039 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827093787349 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846338273785 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155466445925 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869425513266 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.